Tracks
3 cars on record

Okayama International Circuit (Full Course)

Super Formula Lights

25.7 h · 11 days · 346 laps
Started 1:26.123
Now (PB) 1:18.218
Found −7.91s
DayBest lapRunning PBLaps
2026-06-27 1:18.218 1:18.218
2026-06-26 1:18.569 1:18.457
2026-06-24 1:18.457 1:18.457
2026-06-23 1:18.481 1:18.481
2026-06-22 1:18.608 1:18.608
2026-06-21 1:20.101 1:20.101
2026-06-20 1:20.313 1:20.313
2025-12-09 1:21.802 1:21.802
2025-12-08 1:22.222 1:22.222
2025-12-02 1:26.123 1:26.123

The read

10 days · 17→499h into the career
Conditions median track-temp swing 0.0°C · 3 of 10 days swung ≥8°C
Longest plateau 193 days without a PB · 2025-12-09 → 2026-06-20
Breakthrough 2025-12-08 · −3.90s to 1:22.222 · at 19h · 9°C swing
Breakthrough 2026-06-20 · −1.49s to 1:20.313 · at 474h · 0°C, stable
Breakthrough 2026-06-22 · −1.49s to 1:18.608 · at 479h · 12°C swing

Garage61 leaderboard: P3 of 2634 · top 0.1% · as of 2026-06-22

Track read

1. Track Character

Okayama is not a big-speed problem in the Super Formula Lights. The lap turns on two slow exits: the C3 hairpin and the C5 complex. S1 and S2 can be matched to the same-conditions reference. The remaining time is mostly getting the car rotated early enough to use throttle sooner out of those two corners.

The fast sweeper is the trap. It feels like a fourth-gear corner, but the car is already near the 4th-to-5th crossover speed. The data says fifth carries the run onto the straight better on the extra-short stack.

2. Our Setup Build - Week Log

The baseline was Tamas's warmer-track setup run in cooler, higher-grip conditions. That made the car under-sprung for the load it was producing: it squatted, rode the floor, and pushed on exit. The work was a platform correction, not a generic stiffness chase.

StageChangeResult
O0BaselineBest 1:18.457. Bottoming about 25% of the lap.
O1Rear corner springs 131 -> 140 N/mmBest 1:18.278. Bottoming 25% -> 17%. Kept.
O2Front heave 60 -> 70 N/mm, ride height heldBest 1:18.218. Best-5 1:18.267 over 11 laps. Bottoming 17% -> 14%. Keeper.
O3Front heave 70 -> 80 -> 90 N/mmInconclusive. Bottoming kept falling, but the track was heavily used and not reset, so the lap loss is confounded.
O4Rear ride height loweredInconclusive. Slower in that run, but not a clean rejection because the track state had drifted.

O2 is the banked keeper. The later edge-finding still matters, but O3 and O4 are no longer clean rejects: the track was heavily used and not reset, so the speed loss may be surface drift rather than setup. What survives is narrower: the O0 -> O2 platform correction worked, and the O3/O4 questions need a reset-track A/B before they go on the kept/rejected board.

3. Reference Comparison

The Tamas reference lap in corners.json is a corner-shape reference, not the lap-time ceiling. It is useful for gears, brake pressure territory, and where the car should be trailing brake versus taking throttle.

The same-conditions pace reference is Anh Nguyen at 1:18.067. The current PB is 1:18.218, a 0.151 s gap. The current read is specific: C3 and C5 are still late to full throttle. C1, C7, and the S1/S2 run are not the current limiter.

4. Tamas's New Setup

No public-safe comparison to a new Okayama release is recorded yet. The work on this page should be read as our measured build from the available baseline and local telemetry, not as a statement about a later setup release.

5. Corner Read

The table below carries the exact references. The session read is simpler: Okayama is about converting the two slow exits without giving away the fast sweeper.

  • C3 is the main limiter. The target is not more apex speed; it is turning the brake release into earlier, cleaner throttle.
  • C5 is the follow-up limiter. The gain is smaller than C3, but the same throttle-conversion problem shows up there.
  • The fast sweeper is the gear-choice trap. Fifth looks less obvious, but it carries the straight on the extra-short stack.
  • C1 and C7 are not the current time leak. Keep them tidy and spend attention on the exits that still move the lap.

6. Open Questions

  • Rear third spring is still 0 N/mm. It is the next untested platform lever.
  • O3/O4 need a reset-track A/B before either change is called rejected.
  • The keeper has not been run to a full stint or pit stop, so tyre wear and race pace are still unread.
  • Late-session hot pressure rose about 3 kPa. A cold-pressure step for hotter track state is still untested.

7. Takeaways

  • Grip has an axis. A setup from a hotter, lower-grip state can be too soft when the track is cooler and faster.
  • Bottoming is not the target by itself. It improved past the keeper, but track-state drift makes the later lap losses inconclusive.
  • Gear choice belongs to road speed, not the shift light. At the Okayama sweeper, fifth is the gear that carries the straight.
  • The next lap time is not hiding everywhere. Right now it is C3 and C5 exit conversion.

Corner reference

reference lap: 1:19.233
CornerGearApexBrake
Turn 1, fourth-gear right 4 138 km/h 57%
Third-gear right 3 126 km/h 66%
Hairpin, second gear 2 83 km/h 80%
Third-gear link 3 128 km/h 0%
Tight complex, second gear 2 85 km/h 66%
Complex second apex 2 87 km/h 11%
Fast fourth-gear right 4 150 km/h 27%

Current keeper: O2

quali-proven · not race ready

Quali pace only. The keeper has not been run to a full stint or a pit stop, so tyre wear and race pace are unread. No race validation yet.

O2 · keeper
1:18.218
Best lap
Theoretical
1:18.013
Peak speed
230.4 km/h
Front ride height (static)
15.5 mm
Rear ride height (static)
36.3 mm
Front P-rod length offset
-29.0 mm
Rear P-rod length offset
33.0 mm
Front heave spring
70 N/mm
Rear corner springs
140 N/mm
Rear third spring
0 N/mm
Front torsion bar OD
13.57 mm
Front ARB
Medium / Long / blades 1-1
Rear ARB
Medium / Position 1
Front camber
-4.0 deg
Rear camber
-2.9 deg
Front toe
-1.1 mm
Rear toe
+0.3 mm
Front flap
22 deg
Rear upper wing
28 deg
Rear beam wing
15 deg
Diff
60 coast / 80 drive / 4 faces / 60 Nm
Brake bias
54.5%
Gear stack
extra-short
Cold pressure
124 kPa all round

Setup lab: every test on record

5 stages

Tamas's setup was built for a warmer, lower-grip track. On Okayama's cooler, higher-grip surface it was under-sprung: the car made more download, the platform squatted, and it rode the floor about a quarter of the lap. The lab firmed the platform to match the grip available. One variable at a time, verified by setup diff before each session.

O0

Baseline

baseline

Tamas's setup, built for a warmer, lower-grip track, run on Okayama's cooler, higher-grip surface.

  • Rear corner springs 131 N/mm, front heave 60 N/mm.
  • Rear third spring 0 N/mm, cold pressure 124 kPa all round.

Best 1:18.457. Understeery; the platform squatted on exit and rode the floor about a quarter of the lap (25% bottoming).

O1

Rear corner springs

Stiffened the rear to hold the platform under the grip.

  • Rear corner springs 131 -> 140 N/mm (both sides).

Best 1:18.278 (-0.18). Bottoming 25 -> 17%, rear held 2.4 mm higher, rake +2.7 mm. Kept.

O2

Front heave spring

keeper

Firmed the front platform; P-rod held the ride height.

  • Front heave 60 -> 70 N/mm.
  • Front P-rod -29.0 mm, ride height held at 15.5 mm.

Best 1:18.218 (-0.06), best-5 1:18.267 over 11 laps. Bottoming 17 -> 14%. Kept, the keeper.

O3

Front heave, further

inconclusive

Stepped the front heave past the keeper to find the edge.

  • Front heave 70 -> 80, then 90 N/mm.

Inconclusive. Bottoming kept falling (13%, then 11%), but the track state was heavily used and was not reset, so the 0.3 s loss is not a clean front-heave rejection. Needs a reset-track A/B before 80/90 N/mm is called bad.

O4

Rear ride height

inconclusive

Lowered the rear to test for more.

  • Rear P-rod 33.0 -> 31.0 mm (rear ride height 36.3 -> 35.4 mm).

Inconclusive. Slower in that run, but it shares the same track-state problem. Treat the rear-lower result as open until a reset-track A/B confirms it.

Sector bests

Best lapTheoreticalS1S2S3S4
1:18.218 1:17.976 17.91317.32916.71126.023

Session log

last 12
DateTypeBest lapLapsSim time
2026-06-27 00:04:16 practice 1:18.812 4 0.28h
2026-06-26 23:50:03 practice 1:18.730 6 0.23h
2026-06-26 23:07:00 practice 1:18.799 6 0.62h
2026-06-26 22:48:50 practice 1:18.715 5 0.28h
2026-06-26 21:52:17 practice 1:18.489 6 0.23h
2026-06-26 21:50:34 practice - - 0.00h
2026-06-26 21:34:50 practice 1:18.529 7 0.25h
2026-06-26 20:59:19 practice 1:18.218 11 0.43h
2026-06-26 20:58:59 practice - - 0.00h
2026-06-26 19:08:22 practice 1:18.278 8 0.24h
2026-06-26 19:06:07 practice - - 0.03h
2026-06-26 18:29:29 practice 1:18.643 9 0.45h